<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.81 - 31 Jul 2006 - BenKeppler)

Changed:
< <	Support for ejbGen 4 0
> >	Support for ejbGen 5 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.80 - 14 Feb 2006 - MikeSale)

Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 9 0
> >	OC4J integration 10 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.79 - 21 Mar 2005 - AlekseyLubimov)

Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 8 0
> >	OC4J integration 9 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.78 - 12 Oct 2004 - TWikiGuest)

Changed:
< <	Direct Integration for the JDO/JDO 2.0 (XML-creation, importing entities from database) and so on '''without''' XDoclet 1 0
> >	Direct Integration for the JDO/JDO 2.0 (XML-creation, importing entities from database) and so on '''without''' XDoclet 2 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.77 - 30 Sep 2004 - FreeCreate)

Changed:
< <	More support for J2EE presentation technologies specially JavaServer Faces (visual editing, code generation, XML editiong, ...) 1 0
> >	More support for J2EE presentation technologies specially JavaServer Faces (visual editing, code generation, XML editiong, ...) 2 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.76 - 15 Sep 2004 - GalaxyER)

Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 7 0
> >	OC4J integration 8 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.75 - 09 Sep 2004 - StevenDuren)

Changed:
< <	Direct Integration for the hibernate framework (XML-creation) and so on '''without''' XDoclet 1 0
> >	Direct Integration for the hibernate framework (XML-creation) and so on '''without''' XDoclet 2 0   Direct Integration for the JDO/JDO 2.0 (XML-creation, importing entities from database) and so on '''without''' XDoclet 1 0   More support for J2EE presentation technologies specially JavaServer Faces (visual editing, code generation, XML editiong, ...) 1 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.74 - 12 Aug 2004 - TorbenLorentzen)

Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 6 0
> >	OC4J integration 7 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.73 - 11 Aug 2004 - TWikiGuest)

Changed:
< <	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 9 0
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 9 1 That is a nice request too - But since a senior java analyst from sun austria told me to use hibernate instead of CMP Entity Beans i don't think anyone needs this feature - CMP's will vanish in EJB3.0 and will be replaced by some sort of "standardized" hibernate-framework. Direct Integration for the hibernate framework (XML-creation) and so on '''without''' XDoclet 1 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.72 - 05 May 2004 - MarkHoman)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 23 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 24 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.71 - 01 Apr 2004 - RobertoPoli)

Changed:
< <	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 8 0
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 9 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.70 - 29 Mar 2004 - RuneLarsen)

Changed:
< <	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 7 0
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 8 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.69 - 13 Jan 2004 - RalfZimmermann)

Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 5 0
> >	OC4J integration 6 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.68 - 09 Jan 2004 - KeremErsoy)

Changed:
< <	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 6 0
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 7 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.67 - 08 Jan 2004 - SatishSrinivasan)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 22 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 23 1
Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 17 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
> >	Support for xDoclet 18 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
Changed:
< <	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 5 0
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 6 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.66 - 06 Jan 2004 - MichaelArndt)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 21 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 22 1
Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 16 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
> >	Support for xDoclet 17 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
Changed:
< <	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 4 0
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 5 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.65 - 02 Jan 2004 - KonstantinSobolev)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 20 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 21 1
Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 15 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
> >	Support for xDoclet 16 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.64 - 23 Dec 2003 - ThomasSaxtoft)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 19 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 20 1
Changed:
< <	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 3 0
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 4 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.63 - 19 Dec 2003 - JariRantala)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 18 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 19 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.62 - 08 Dec 2003 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	Web Modules

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.61 - 27 Nov 2003 - DariusHenkelmann)

Changed:
< <	Support for ejbGen 3 0
> >	Support for ejbGen 4 0
Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 4 0   Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 2 0
> >	OC4J integration 5 0   Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 3 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.60 - 23 Oct 2003 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	WebLogic integration

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.59 - 26 Sep 2003 - AndyPruitt)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 14 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
> >	Support for xDoclet 15 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.58 - 19 Sep 2003 - NorbertKuchenmeister)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 17 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 18 1
Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 3 0
> >	OC4J integration 4 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.57 - 15 Sep 2003 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Changed:
< <	Already implemented features (that is, features which will be available in the build next to the current): EJB related Automatic discovery of EJB deployment descriptors, EJB groups, EJBs Tree-like EJB view (showing EJB Groups/EJBs/Classes/CMP fields/CMR fields/PK classes/EJB-relevant methods) Create/delete new EJB Group (including deployment descriptor generation) Create/delete Session bean (including DD modification, Home/Local home/Remote/Local/Ejb Java class generation) Create/delete Entity bean (including DD modification, Home/Local home/Remote/Local/Ejb/PK Java class generation) Create/delete Message Driven bean (including DD modification, Ejb Java class generation) Create/rename/delete CMP field for Entity bean (including DD modification, getter/setter/field generation) Create/rename/delete CMR field for CMP2.0 Entity bean (including DD modification, getter/setter generation) Add interface based on another type interface (E.g. Add local interface similar to existing remote) Delete EJB interface Select EJB-related class being edited in EJB View (Alt-F1) Intention for implementing business method/finder method/create method in EJB Class Intention for declaring business method/finder method/create method in EJB Interface Support for "Business Interface" pattern EJB specific error highlighting (see EjbHighlightingFeatures for details) EJB 'quick-fix' intentions (see EjbQuickFixIntentions for details) Create value object based on EJB Class Edit method transaction attibutes in Deployment descriptor DD Transaction attributes editing DD Security Roles editing DD Method permissions editing DD Environment entries editing DD EJB References editing DD Resource references editing DD Resource environment references editing EJB specific code inspection
> >	EJB Support Features J2EE Modules setup FAQ

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.56 - 09 Sep 2003 - GwynEvans)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 13 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
> >	Support for xDoclet 14 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.55 - 24 Jun 2003 - DmitriColebatch)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 12 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away.
> >	Support for xDoclet 13 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away. My suggestion (dimc@sourceforgeNOSPAM321.net) is to try the plugin as suggested below. This provides a huge amount of help when you are not sure of the tags/attributes required.
Changed:
< <	-- MarcusBrito - 05 Dec 2002
> >	XDoclet support would be made much easier by exposing the code tree API so that instead of using XJavadoc we could make an implementation based on the IntelliJ internal API. I know this is possible, but at the moment its not "officially" exposed, and there are no docs on it. -- DmitriColebatch - 24 Jun 2003

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.54 - 09 May 2003 - WesleyHall)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 11 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away.
> >	Support for xDoclet 12 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away.

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.53 - 23 Apr 2003 - TWikiGuest)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 11 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 11 1 xDoclet is a lovely idea, and when it works it's great - but it's not very robust. Eg it throws out of bounds exceptions rather than telling you it found an xdoclet tag it wasn't expecting. If xdoclet (ever) get that sorted then yeah, great, integrate it. For now my vote is to keep away.

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.52 - 12 Mar 2003 - DonatasCiuksys)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 10 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 11 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.51 - 05 Mar 2003 - BennyNg)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 16 1   Support for ejbGen 2 0   Support for xDoclet 9 0   OC4J integration 2 0   Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 1 0
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 17 1   Support for ejbGen 3 0   Support for xDoclet 10 0   OC4J integration 3 0   Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 2 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.50 - 11 Feb 2003 - DmitryNevozhai)

Added:
> >	Wizard to generate CMP EBs from DB schema 1 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.49 - 11 Feb 2003 - ThomasSaxtoft)

Changed:
< <	OC4J integration 1 0
> >	OC4J integration 2 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.48 - 08 Feb 2003 - FaramarzSaberi)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 15 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 16 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.47 - 06 Feb 2003 - MarcStock)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 14 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 15 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.46 - 06 Feb 2003 - DmitryNevozhai)

Added:
> >	OC4J integration 1 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.45 - 27 Jan 2003 - VadirajDeshpande)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 13 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 14 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.44 - 22 Jan 2003 - ChrisHansen)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 8 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 9 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.43 - 09 Jan 2003 - RoozbehGhaffari)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 7 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 8 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.42 - 27 Dec 2002 - DanBachelder)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 6 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 7 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.41 - 27 Dec 2002 - RogerWegner)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 5 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 6 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.40 - 10 Dec 2002 - TWikiGuest)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 4 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 5 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.39 - 05 Dec 2002 - AlessandroVernet)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 12 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 13 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.38 - 05 Dec 2002 - MarcusBrito)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 3 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 4 0
Added:
> >	Note that XDoclet support would automatically enable IDEA to generate deployment descriptors for a bunch of application servers. So the first option could be considered solved if XDoclet is integrated with IDEA. We have some preview of what could be done now. KonstantinPribluda? has written a XDocletGUI plugin for IDEA. Download the latest release to check it out. -- MarcusBrito - 05 Dec 2002

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.37 - 30 Nov 2002 - PerThomasJahr)

Changed:
< <	Support for xDoclet 2 0
> >	Support for xDoclet 3 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.36 - 29 Nov 2002 - SvenBeauprez)

Changed:
< <	Support for ejbGen 1 0   Support for xDoclet 1 0
> >	Support for ejbGen 2 0   Support for xDoclet 2 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.35 - 29 Nov 2002 - PeterVerkest)

Added:
> >	Support for ejbGen 1 0   Support for xDoclet 1 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.34 - 28 Nov 2002 - TWikiGuest)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 11 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 12 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.33 - 23 Nov 2002 - JoeParks)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 10 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 11 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.32 - 07 Nov 2002 - DonatasCiuksys)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 9 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 10 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.31 - 24 Oct 2002 - KevinThomas)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 8 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 9 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.30 - 23 Oct 2002 - JeffKenward)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 7 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 8 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.29 - 14 Sep 2002 - TylerBye)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 6 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 7 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.28 - 09 Sep 2002 - ChrisP)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 5 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 6 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.27 - 04 Sep 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	DD Transaction attributes editing DD Security Roles editing DD Method permissions editing DD Environment entries editing DD EJB References editing DD Resource references editing DD Resource environment references editing EJB specific code inspection
Deleted:
< <	Method permissions editing in DD 5 0   Environment entries editing in DD 4 1   EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 3 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.26 - 31 Aug 2002 - TWikiGuest)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 4 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 5 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.25 - 30 Aug 2002 - MichaelHedgpeth)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 3 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 4 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.24 - 22 Aug 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	Edit method transaction attibutes in Deployment descriptor
Deleted:
< <	Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 4 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.23 - 12 Aug 2002 - MichaelNestler)

Changed:
< <	Environment entries editing in DD 3 1   Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 3 0   EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 2 0
> >	Environment entries editing in DD 4 1   Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 4 0   EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 3 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.22 - 30 Jul 2002 - TWikiGuest)

Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 2 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 3 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.21 - 19 Jul 2002 - AlainRavet)

Added:
> >	CategoryIdeasAndSuggestions, CategoryPolls

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.20 - 19 Jul 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	Create value object based on EJB Class
Deleted:
< <	Create value object based on EJB Class 7 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.19 - 19 Jul 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	EJB 'quick-fix' intentions (see EjbQuickFixIntentions for details)

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.18 - 19 Jul 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	EJB specific error highlighting (see EjbHighlightingFeatures for details)
Changed:
< <	Features under development:
> >
Deleted:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting (see EjbHighlightingFeatures for details)

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.17 - 17 Jul 2002 - RegisBrochu)

Changed:
< <	Create value object based on EJB Class 6 1   Method permissions editing in DD 4 0
> >	Create value object based on EJB Class 7 1   Method permissions editing in DD 5 0
Changed:
< <	Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 2 0
> >	Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 3 0
Changed:
< <	Various application servers deployment integration 1 1
> >	Various application servers deployment integration 2 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.16 - 05 Jul 2002 - SlawaNagorniy)

Changed:
< <	Method permissions editing in DD 3 0   Environment entries editing in DD 2 1
> >	Method permissions editing in DD 4 0   Environment entries editing in DD 3 1
Changed:
< <	EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 1 0   Various application servers deployment integration 0 1
> >	EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 2 0   Various application servers deployment integration 1 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.15 - 01 Jul 2002 - AndersHolmbechNielsen)

Changed:
< <	Create value object based on EJB Class 5 1
> >	Create value object based on EJB Class 6 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.14 - 01 Jul 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Changed:
< <	Add new feature if you think it deserves IDEA support.
> >	Add new feature if you think it deserves IDEA support (press 'Edit' at the bottom of page).
Changed:
< <	Feature For Against Create value object based on EJB Class 5 1 Method permissions editing in DD 3 0 Environment entries editing in DD 2 1 Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 2 0 EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 1 0
> >	Feature For Against Comment Create value object based on EJB Class 5 1   Method permissions editing in DD 3 0   Environment entries editing in DD 2 1   Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 2 0   EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 1 0   Various application servers deployment integration 0 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.13 - 28 Jun 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Changed:
< <	Just to keep track which features are implemented already (that is, will be available in the build next to the current):
> >	Already implemented features (that is, features which will be available in the build next to the current):
Changed:
< <	EJB
> >	EJB related

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.12 - 28 Jun 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Changed:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting
> >	EJB specific error highlighting (see EjbHighlightingFeatures for details)

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.11 - 28 Jun 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Changed:
< <	Just to keep track which features are implemented already:
> >	Just to keep track which features are implemented already (that is, will be available in the build next to the current):
Added:
> >	Features under development: EJB specific error highlighting
Changed:
< <	Please increase 'For' or 'Against' counters according to your opinion.
> >	Please increase 'For' or 'Against' counters (by one) according to your opinion.
Deleted:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting 7 0
Deleted:
< <	Environment entries editing in DD 2 1
Added:
> >	Environment entries editing in DD 2 1
Changed:
< <
> >	EJB specific code inspection (E.g. EJB should not write to static fields) 1 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.10 - 28 Jun 2002 - TimurZambalayev)

Changed:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting 6 0
> >	EJB specific error highlighting 7 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.9 - 28 Jun 2002 - RickCole)

Changed:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting 5 0 Create value object based on EJB Class 4 1
> >	EJB specific error highlighting 6 0 Create value object based on EJB Class 5 1

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.8 - 27 Jun 2002 - MatthewHumphrey)

Changed:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting 4 0 Create value object based on EJB Class 4 0 Environment entries editing in DD 1 1 Method permissions editing in DD 2 0
> >	EJB specific error highlighting 5 0 Create value object based on EJB Class 4 1 Environment entries editing in DD 2 1 Method permissions editing in DD 3 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.7 - 26 Jun 2002 - RomSrinivasan)

Changed:
< <	Create value object based on EJB Class 2 0
> >	Create value object based on EJB Class 4 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.6 - 26 Jun 2002 - DouglasBullard)

Changed:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting 3 0 Create value object based on EJB Class 1 0 Environment entries editing in DD 0 1 Method permissions editing in DD 1 0 Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 1 0
> >	EJB specific error highlighting 4 0 Create value object based on EJB Class 2 0 Environment entries editing in DD 1 1 Method permissions editing in DD 2 0 Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 2 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.5 - 26 Jun 2002 - AdrianAntal)

Changed:
< <	EJB specific error highlighting 2 0
> >	EJB specific error highlighting 3 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.4 - 26 Jun 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Changed:
< <	Poll: most wanted J2EE features
> >	Poll: most wanted J2EE features. Please increase 'For' or 'Against' counters according to your opinion. Add new feature if you think it deserves IDEA support.
Added:
> >	EJB specific error highlighting 2 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.3 - 24 Jun 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Added:
> >	EJB
Added:
> >	Poll: most wanted J2EE features Feature For Against Create value object based on EJB Class 1 0 Environment entries editing in DD 0 1 Method permissions editing in DD 1 0 Method transaction attibutes editing in DD 1 0

<<O>>  Difference Topic J2EESupport (r1.2 - 24 Jun 2002 - AlexeyKudravtsev)

Changed:
< <	These features are implemented already.
> >	Want to discuss J2EE Support in IDEA? Welcome to